I try not to dig up old debates, but the comments to a Universal Hub post from December about whether a shooting occurred in Roxbury or the South End are worth looking at again. What I found striking was this comment: "Clarification is sought over something [the Roxbury/South End boundary] which doesn't matter while the more important issue gets glossed over."
First and foremost, the murder in question is the most important issue. But I disagree that clarification of the Roxbury/South End boundary "doesn't matter". As I tried to show in my post comparing the historic and modern maps of Roxbury, the area roughly between Mass Ave, Melnea Cass, and Tremont Street suffers from a lack of definition. It is an interstitial area with some housing, some industrial, and some commerical uses but it doesn't have a strong defining presence like an important public institution, historic site, or other landmark. It falls between what most people think of as the South End, which has a strong architectural definition and boundary with Mass Ave, and Dudley Square, which has its own presence as a historic commercial area.
Why is lack of definition a problem? Undefined areas fall out of the collective eye. I firmly believe that the absence of definition for the Roxbury/South End boundary translates into official confusion about responsibility. Official definitions only occasionally fit neatly into our mental maps of where we live: zip codes, census tracts, City Council districts, police areas, historic districts, empowerment zones, etc. are cross-cutting cleavages which assign and recombine neighborhoods in ways that might be unfamiliar to the people who live there. Jones Hill in Dorchester, for example, is clearly defined (hills tend to be well defined) yet it is divided into two districts for representation in the Massachusetts House. When neighborhoods are split, who takes responsibility for the disparate parts?
We all carve up cities into mentally manageable pieces. The unclaimed area between the South End and Dudley Square represents terra incognita for too many Bostonians. Defining the area is the first step to reintegrating this fuzzy area into the consciousness of Boston.
I apologize for the hurried nature
of this post. This is an issue that deserves more exploration and
I promise to get back to it in future posts.
For those interested in questions of urban form, definition, and how
people experience cities, I direct you to Kevin Lynch's excellent 1960
book, The
Image of City. I consider this book essential for
understanding Boston.
The 1788 law describing the Boston/Roxbury boundary can be found here.
Link: Roxbury or the South End, somebody's still dead | Universal Hub.
________________
Hey.
I agree, totally.
By the way, regarding the South End / Roxbury border and real estate agents - we're way ahead of you.
We call it the "bookend" neighborhood. It's not specific to just that border, but any area between two neighborhoods. That little sliver of land between Bay Village and the South End might be considered a bookend (and maybe the new Columbus Center megaplex, too, between the South End and Back Bay).
Posted by: John K | 03 April 2006 at 13:39
In Lynch's book, the triangle between Huntington Avenue, Boylston Street, and Mass. Ave. was a similar terra incognita, not quite Back Bay and not quite South End. This despite it containing notable landmarks such as Mechanics Hall, Horticultural Hall, and the Christian Science Church.
(The book came out well before the Prudential Center and Christian Science plaza were built.)
Posted by: Ron Newman | 03 April 2006 at 17:44
I work with real estate data for a living and part of the Roxbury/South End issue is that as time goes on what is considered the South End is pushing more & more into Roxbury so the boundaries are shifting on paper.
Posted by: sarah c | 04 April 2006 at 14:05
The Piano Factory, at 791 Tremont Street, participates each year in both South End Open Studios and Roxbury Open Studios.
Posted by: Ron Newman | 04 April 2006 at 16:33
I would also refer to Porteous' book - Environment and Behavior. He wrote about micro, meso, and macro spaces as well as how people define "neighborhood."
Posted by: Georgia | 28 July 2006 at 22:34